Monday, April 30, 2007

Schools Gone Mad

I was listening to the radio and there came a story about hate crimes. Of course, hate crimes are bad, however, this one was rather interesting. There was a school somewhere in the US that is prosecuting a student for a hate crime. The student placed a ham sandwich on a table next to a Muslim kid.
Now, Muslims are not allowed to touch any sort of pig product, and this is incredibly rude of the student to do that! Yet, I find it very contradictory that the school administration is trying to stop a hateful ham sandwich while simultaneously spouting off that Christ is not the Son of God.

Moral to the story: Do not offend Muslims with eating a ham sandwich in their midst!! Do offend Christians by calling them weakminded and intolerant for believing that Christ is the Son of God.

Maybe there is a reason why US schools are lagging in the Western world...we need to focus on teaching them how to appreciate art, know their history and can count! Enough with this hypocritical bias.

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Pacifists MUST Become Realists

"Invite Your Friends to Make Genocide History in 2007"

I saw this name on a group at Facebook. It made me laugh at first, because the meaning could go either way...end genocide, or be a part of the biggest genocide EVER.

Well, now that my funny commentary is out there, it made me truly think. Can we ever end genocide? Yes, we need to push to end it...but do the pacifists who claim to support the termination of genocide believe that force could end it? I will draw your attention to one of my previous posts
My friends, I believe that if social activists want to end genocide then they would have to become Imperialistic Hawks.

How can a Dove get anything accomplished when Islam is involved? Islam desires to destroy you! Islamists want to chop the heads off of each protestor, from Cindy Sheehan to the hippie in San Fran. The Hawk mentality, perhaps, needs to be exerted to end the suffering in Darfur. Becuase, Muslims in the Middle East/North Africa don't listen to songs peace poems. Likewise, they listen to the sword. Learn about Islam my banner carrying friends.

Discuss about Darfur, but then move into action.

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Amazing Grace and Social Action

Once again, I saw Amazing Grace in the theater, this time with my grandparents in Arizona. Well, needless to say, I was equally amazed at the hard-hitting message it gave. I felt as if God was speaking to me through that tale.

William Wilberforce was a politician in 18th-19th Century England and he moves to end the slave trade. Well, through perserverance and the spirit of the Lord guiding him, Wilberforce was able to lead a movement.

I want to be like Wilberforce. I want to walk in the power of God and move mountains. I want to serve God's purpose here on this planet, and I feel this strongly. Moving for societal transformation was important in Wilberforce's life, and centering that around the gospel was key. I believe that Wilberforce is definitely in my Top 5 favorite people. What a life, a life lived solely for God's purpose! You can be a Christian politician!

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Christ Demands Allegiance of Both Classes

Below is an article that me and a friend wrote for an assignment for school. We were asked to do something that challenged the "world's spirit." We wanted to challenge the anti-wealth mentality of many activists and to portray the fact that God demands that rich and poor alike walk humbly before His throne.



Christ came and walked among the masses. He met with the weak throughout his ministry, calling forth the beggars, prostitutes and refuse of society. However, we can also see that he called out and challenged the powerful and wealthy. He went to Matthew the tax collector, met with the Pharisee Nicodemus, aided Centurions, and ate with the tax collector Zacchaeus. But of course, after Jesus’ crucifixion, Joseph of Arimathea (a wealthy man and a disciple of the Messiah) came to bury the body of Christ (with Nicodemus).

Luke 16 tells of a tale of Lazarus and the rich man in the afterlife. The rich man was punished for he already received his reward. Christ would periodically challenge rich people to release their wealth and follow Him. Christ put forth this challenge to make the rich choose between their love of money and following Christ. In the parables of the “Talents” in Matthew 25, a powerful landowner gave his servants a set amount of talents and desired them to invest wisely. Whether they were given five or one talents, the owner wanted them to multiply that amount, and even punished the one who did not invest. He desires the powerful, wealthy, weak, and poor to use their talents and abilities for the Kingdom.

Then there is the person of Lydia. We meet Lydia in Acts 16: 11-15. It is here that we learn that she is a “dealer in purple cloth.” A short history lesson; purple is the color of royalty, hence why it was mocking for the soldiers in Mark 15: 17 to place a purple robe around his shoulders when he claimed to be the King of the Jews. If one was dealing in purple cloth you can assume that they were of no meager means. Lydia, in Acts 16: 15, accepts the gospel along with her whole household. She then asks Paul, Silas, and Timothy to stay at her house. If the lord favored the poor why did he call Lydia? And why didn’t he ask her to give up all her wealth to follow him like he did the rich young ruler? I think the answer may lie in the desires of Lydia’s heart, rather then the size of her bank account.

“People who want to get rich fall into temptation(s)… that plunge men into ruin and destruction.” (1 Timothy 6: 9) Here we see that it is the desire to “get rich” which causes many problems, not the money. In fact in 2 Corinthians 9: 11 it says “You will be made rich in every way so that you can be generous on every occasion, and through us [the church] your generosity will result in thanksgiving to God.” This sounds to me that God would have us prosper so that we can give. We are essentially “Blessed to be a Blessing,” as my church would say. So let us be aware of whom God is. He is a God for sinners, rich or poor.

The anti-wealth mentality of many “do-gooders” is something to be applauded, however, perhaps these have (to borrow from Adventures in Missing the Point) missed the point. Christ met with the poor people and rich people alike throughout his earthly ministry. He met with the Roman centurions and with the beggars. He called both fishermen and tax collectors. Lesslie Newbigin would state that “his cross is not for some and against others,” it is for all people! He challenged people and classes where they were.

Yes, God is for justice, but perhaps the Lord seeks to have the oppressors and the oppressed to bow down before the cross in humility. Once they would do this, then perhaps true justice and peace can reign throughout the land. It is amazing that Christians, like William Wilberforce of the abolitionary forces in England, can be empowered through God’s grace to end injustice. Through someone who lays their life daily before the altar, amazing things can occur and mountains can be moved. Wilberforce and others used their status and power to further justice and societal transformation. God is interested in the souls of the rich and poor alike, and He wants both to willingly give their allegiance to Him.

Monday, April 09, 2007

Perhaps War is the Answer

Below is an excerpt from America Alone that I have been reading for a class. I could not help but think about the irony, and that the replacement of "Free Tibet" with "Save Darfur" makes it incredibly relevant.
...It must be great to be the guy with the printing contract for the "FREE TIBET" stickers. Not so good to be the guy back in Tibet wondering when the freeing thereof will actually get under way. Are you in favor of a Free Tibet? It's hard to find anyone who isn't. Every college in America is. ...

Everyone's for a free Tibet, but no one's for freeing Tibet. So Tibet will stay unfree now as it was when the first Free Tibet campaigner slapped the very first "FREE TIBET" sticker onto the back of his Edsel. Idealism as inertia is the hallmark of the movement. Well, not entirely inertia: it must be a pain in the neck when you trade in the Volvo for a Subaru and have to bend down and paste on a new "FREE TIBET" sticker. For a while, my otherwise not terribly political wife got extremely irritated by the Free Tibet shtick, demanding to know at a pancake breakfast at the local church what precisely some harmless hippy-dippy old neighbor of ours meant by the sticker he'd been proudly displaying decade in, decade out: "But what exactly are you doing to free Tibet?" she insisted. "You're not doing anything, are you?"

"Give the guy a break," I said when we got back home. He's advertising moral superiority, not calling for action. If Rumsfelf were to say, 'Free Tibet? Jiminy, what a swell idea! The Third Infantry Division goes in on Thursday,' the bumper-sticker crowd would be aghast. They'd bend down and peel off the 'FREE TIBET' stickers and replace them with 'WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER.'"
I say this not to belittle the pacifist/social movement crowd, but to draw a larger point. That sometimes, out of compassion and love, war might be a necessity. What is more loving, allowing a people group to get slaughtered, and protest or actually fighting for them? Kosovo was a military incursion to stop genocide. Stopping genocide and murder is important, but let us remember that perhaps defense is necessary (following Paul's argument in Romans 13). Sometimes war is the answer.